<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clifford Lynch and Jonathan Band on Google Book Search</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancohen.org/2005/11/28/clifford-lynch-and-jonathan-band-on-google-book-search/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2005/11/28/clifford-lynch-and-jonathan-band-on-google-book-search/</link>
	<description>Covering the intersection of digital technology and research, teaching, and learning in the humanities, including search, data mining, website development and design, and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2005/11/28/clifford-lynch-and-jonathan-band-on-google-book-search/comment-page-1/#comment-2703</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 14:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/2005/11/28/clifford-lynch-and-jonathan-band-on-google-book-search/#comment-2703</guid>
		<description>[...] which has been digitizing millions of books from libraries. (Hard to believe, but the lawsuit was first covered on this blog all the way back in November 2005.) Undoubtedly this agreement is a critical one not only for Google and the authors and publishers, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which has been digitizing millions of books from libraries. (Hard to believe, but the lawsuit was first covered on this blog all the way back in November 2005.) Undoubtedly this agreement is a critical one not only for Google and the authors and publishers, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
