<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wikipedia vs. Encyclopaedia Britannica for Digital Research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancohen.org/2006/01/30/wikipedia-vs-encyclopaedia-britannica-for-digital-research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2006/01/30/wikipedia-vs-encyclopaedia-britannica-for-digital-research/</link>
	<description>Covering the intersection of digital technology and research, teaching, and learning in the humanities, including search, data mining, website development and design, and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 14:12:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2006/01/30/wikipedia-vs-encyclopaedia-britannica-for-digital-research/comment-page-1/#comment-1665</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 18:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/2006/01/30/wikipedia-vs-encyclopaedia-britannica-for-digital-research/#comment-1665</guid>
		<description>[...] of high quality data mining and search tools, including for historical research. (I also ran a test, the results of which were mixed, but promising.) Now comes a workshop entitled &#8220;Wikipedia [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of high quality data mining and search tools, including for historical research. (I also ran a test, the results of which were mixed, but promising.) Now comes a workshop entitled &#8220;Wikipedia [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

