<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Methodology, Not Ideology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancohen.org/2008/03/13/methodology-not-ideology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/03/13/methodology-not-ideology/</link>
	<description>Covering the intersection of digital technology and research, teaching, and learning in the humanities, including search, data mining, website development and design, and programming.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 02:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: On the New Dawn of methodology, and other digital-booster claims &#171; The Vapour Trail</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/03/13/methodology-not-ideology/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator>On the New Dawn of methodology, and other digital-booster claims &#171; The Vapour Trail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/2008/03/13/methodology-not-ideology/#comment-2100</guid>
		<description>[...] argument has been taken up by a number of other scholarly bloggers, predictably from the field of digital history and new media. It is time, these enthuasiasts [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] argument has been taken up by a number of other scholarly bloggers, predictably from the field of digital history and new media. It is time, these enthuasiasts [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
