<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/</link>
	<description>Covering the intersection of digital technology and research, teaching, and learning in the humanities, including search, data mining, website development and design, and programming.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:26:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Who&#8217;s Afraid of Ranking History Journals? &#171; Clio Machine</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator>Who&#8217;s Afraid of Ranking History Journals? &#171; Clio Machine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-3328</guid>
		<description>[...] in history will never be complete until we include both articles and monographs. Now that the API for Google Books is being updated, we are on the verge of creating text mining algorithms that can scan the endnotes and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in history will never be complete until we include both articles and monographs. Now that the API for Google Books is being updated, we are on the verge of creating text mining algorithms that can scan the endnotes and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scholars&#8217; Lab Blog - STAGING &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Scholar: Neglected Corridors of the Interwebs</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2799</link>
		<dc:creator>Scholars&#8217; Lab Blog - STAGING &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google Scholar: Neglected Corridors of the Interwebs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 21:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2799</guid>
		<description>[...] Google’s case. At this juncture, it&#8217;s unclear how the recent Google Books settlement (see Dan Cohen&#8217;s analysis) or changes in PDF access through Google will impact the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google’s case. At this juncture, it&#8217;s unclear how the recent Google Books settlement (see Dan Cohen&#8217;s analysis) or changes in PDF access through Google will impact the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Campus #33 - Classroom Action Settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2748</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cohen&#8217;s Digital Humanities Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Digital Campus #33 - Classroom Action Settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 18:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2748</guid>
		<description>[...] the Digital Campus podcast triumphantly returns to the airwaves with a discussion of the recent Google Book Search settlement. Also up for analysis are Microsoft&#8217;s move to the cloud, the new Google phone, and, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Digital Campus podcast triumphantly returns to the airwaves with a discussion of the recent Google Book Search settlement. Also up for analysis are Microsoft&#8217;s move to the cloud, the new Google phone, and, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Carlile</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2729</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Carlile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 03:18:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2729</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an interesting idea, but one they&#039;ve long been planning. If you look at their UC agreement, it&#039;s obvious that this was their business model all along: 

&#039;4.3... Google agrees that to the extent that it or its successors use any Digitized Selected Content in connection with any Google Services, it shall provide a service at no cost to End Users (1) for both search and display of search results and (2) for access to the display of the full text of public domain works contained in the Digitized Selected Content. To the extent portions of the Google Digital Copy are either In the public domain or where Google has otherwise obtained authorization, Google shall have the right, in its sole discretion, among other things, to (a) index the full text or content, (b) serve and display full-sized digital images corresponding to those portions, (c) make available full text of content for printing and/or download, and (d) make copies of such portions of the Google Digital Copy and provide, license, or sell such copies (including, without limitation, to its syndication partners). For all  other portions of the Google Digital Copy, Google may index the full text or content but may not serve or display the full-sized digital image or make available for printing, streaming and/or download the full content unless Google has permission or license from the copyright owner to do so; Google instead may serve and display (1) an excerpt that Google reasonably determines would constitute fair use under copyright law and (2) bibliographic (e.g., title, author, date, etc) and other non-copyrighted information....&#039;


But notice that their UC agreement also requires them to make all public domain books freely available, which they are not always doing. Many pre-1964 books are not in copyright any longer- millions, in fact. Google is hoarding those books, in violation of at least this one library scanning agreement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an interesting idea, but one they&#8217;ve long been planning. If you look at their UC agreement, it&#8217;s obvious that this was their business model all along: </p>
<p>&#8216;4.3&#8230; Google agrees that to the extent that it or its successors use any Digitized Selected Content in connection with any Google Services, it shall provide a service at no cost to End Users (1) for both search and display of search results and (2) for access to the display of the full text of public domain works contained in the Digitized Selected Content. To the extent portions of the Google Digital Copy are either In the public domain or where Google has otherwise obtained authorization, Google shall have the right, in its sole discretion, among other things, to (a) index the full text or content, (b) serve and display full-sized digital images corresponding to those portions, (c) make available full text of content for printing and/or download, and (d) make copies of such portions of the Google Digital Copy and provide, license, or sell such copies (including, without limitation, to its syndication partners). For all  other portions of the Google Digital Copy, Google may index the full text or content but may not serve or display the full-sized digital image or make available for printing, streaming and/or download the full content unless Google has permission or license from the copyright owner to do so; Google instead may serve and display (1) an excerpt that Google reasonably determines would constitute fair use under copyright law and (2) bibliographic (e.g., title, author, date, etc) and other non-copyrighted information&#8230;.&#8217;</p>
<p>But notice that their UC agreement also requires them to make all public domain books freely available, which they are not always doing. Many pre-1964 books are not in copyright any longer- millions, in fact. Google is hoarding those books, in violation of at least this one library scanning agreement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 03:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>yeah, sure, google&#039;s gonna give people the ability to
run analyses against its database of all those books,
sure it is...  i&#039;ve become convinced this is a sell-out,
designed to erect a huge barrier to entry by others...

-bowerbird</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, sure, google&#8217;s gonna give people the ability to<br />
run analyses against its database of all those books,<br />
sure it is&#8230;  i&#8217;ve become convinced this is a sell-out,<br />
designed to erect a huge barrier to entry by others&#8230;</p>
<p>-bowerbird</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Books &#38; Lawsuit &#171; Hebrew Scriptures and More . . . .</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2712</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Books &#38; Lawsuit &#171; Hebrew Scriptures and More . . . .</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:29:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2712</guid>
		<description>[...] 4) Dan Cohen, First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4) Dan Cohen, First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Books and Programmatic Full-Text Access &#171; Work Product</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Books and Programmatic Full-Text Access &#171; Work Product</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>[...] to follow. In the meantime, see Dan Cohen&#8217;s &#8220;First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement,&#8221; which hits the high [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to follow. In the meantime, see Dan Cohen&#8217;s &#8220;First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement,&#8221; which hits the high [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google reaches Settlement over Google Books/Scholar &#124; Nerdlets</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2708</link>
		<dc:creator>Google reaches Settlement over Google Books/Scholar &#124; Nerdlets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2708</guid>
		<description>[...] battle with copyright laws and privacy issues, and appears to be a good compromise. Dan Cohen has a more skeptical take. Your thoughts? Related Nerdlets [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] battle with copyright laws and privacy issues, and appears to be a good compromise. Dan Cohen has a more skeptical take. Your thoughts? Related Nerdlets [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Books lawsuit settled &#171; Pondering Archivist</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2707</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Books lawsuit settled &#171; Pondering Archivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2707</guid>
		<description>[...] Cohen at the Center for History and New Media blogs: First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Google Print and Fair UseGoogle Settles Suit Over [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cohen at the Center for History and New Media blogs: First Impressions of the Google Books Settlement. Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Google Print and Fair UseGoogle Settles Suit Over [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: apsed &#124; Accord de l&#8217;Association des éditeurs américains (AAP) avec Google</title>
		<link>http://www.dancohen.org/2008/10/28/first-impressions-of-the-google-books-settlement/comment-page-1/#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>apsed &#124; Accord de l&#8217;Association des éditeurs américains (AAP) avec Google</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 16:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dancohen.org/?p=445#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>[...] Dan Cohen, Center for History and new media, George Mason University (via J.A. Furtado) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Dan Cohen, Center for History and new media, George Mason University (via J.A. Furtado) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
